|
Revision 432, 0.5 KB
(checked in by mgalloy, 5 years ago)
|
|
Split ISSUES file into 'Known bugs' and 'Backward-compatibility issues'.
|
| Line | |
|---|
| 1 | Known bug |
|---|
| 2 | ------------ |
|---|
| 3 | |
|---|
| 4 | There are no known bugs. Please add tickets for new bugs and add feature |
|---|
| 5 | requests at the project website, idldoc.idldev.com. |
|---|
| 6 | |
|---|
| 7 | |
|---|
| 8 | Backward-compatibility issues |
|---|
| 9 | ----------------------------- |
|---|
| 10 | |
|---|
| 11 | * A comment block separated from a routine header by a blank line would be |
|---|
| 12 | associated with the routine in IDLdoc 2.0, but is considered a file level |
|---|
| 13 | comment in IDL 3.0. In particularly, param, keyword, and returns tags in that |
|---|
| 14 | comment block would now generate warnings since they are routine level comment |
|---|
| 15 | tags in a file level comment. |
|---|
| 16 | |
|---|
